All photographs are edited? - Weekend

All photographs are edited?

Albert PedrosaAlbert Pedrosa
Photo mania

THERE’S a negative impression when you say that a photo is edited. Especially now that the word “photoshopped” means that an image is manipulated. I don’t even get a red underline in my word processor typing the word. I find it sad as a photographer when faced with this situation.

I’ve been editing photos since the early 90s. I have experienced how the magic of Photoshop started and the many solutions it has provided to the graphics industry. Without Photoshop, the digital image wouldn’t have proliferated as much as it has today. Photoshop was created before with the purpose to assemble the data received from a scanner into a digital image. A digital camera now acts as a scanner.

Without Photoshop breaking the barriers between a printed picture and a digital image, there’s no way for you to share images through email or view it in your computer. Maybe Facebook wouldn’t be here if not for image editing softwares like Photoshop.

EDITED OR NOT? To show that a photograph is unedited, a new term was made: SOOC means, straight out of the camera. When I posted this photo in social media, I wanted to put SOOC because it came out as it is. However, considering that I adjusted the white balance, saturation and contrast in the picture style in my camera. Is it still considered unedited? (Model: Yasmin Johnstone)
EDITED OR NOT? To show that a photograph is unedited, a new term was made: SOOC means, straight out of the camera. When I posted this photo in social media, I wanted to put SOOC because it came out as it is. However, considering that I adjusted the white balance, saturation and contrast in the picture style in my camera. Is it still considered unedited? (Model: Yasmin Johnstone)

The negative impression when you say “editing” stems from the fact that an image can be unreal. A photograph has always been a source of truth and reality, so when you introduce a technology that can allow you to manipulate an image, a photograph becomes unreliable.

Reuters recently changed their requirement when submitting photos to them. This time, only JPEG files are accepted. The objective is to reduce the weight of the image when sending to the agency. They also wanted photo contributors to shoot as it is and submit without editing it.

The decision was made following an incident where a war image submitted to them was edited. The photographer cloned the image, removing unwanted elements in the shot. Imagine if news agencies where truth is the core of their existence, would start to lose credibility. It would be a disaster.

We all know that a photograph is a medium of art and the same photograph is medium of truth. When digital images came in, the truthfulness falls under the hands of the photographer and the editor. Even in the advertising industry where products are promoted using an image, false advertising is big issue today.

One skincare product in Europe was fined and ordered to pull down their billboards over the unreal effect of the product. The image was photoshopped according to the advertising board. For both news and advertising agencies, the dilemma of image truthfulness hangs on the balance.

I don’t know how we will see a photograph in the future. I totally believe that the aided technology in imaging will go further and continue to break barriers. I know that the art side of a photography will continue, I’m not sure with the truthfulness though.
Keep on shooting, everyone!

photomania.sunstar@gmail.com
www.grp.ph

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *